Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Whether the appellant's claim qualified as a "financial debt" under Section 5(8) of the IBC and therefore should have been classified as a financial creditor: the tribunal held that the resolution professional's uploaded List of Creditors treated the appellant as an "other creditor," a classification the appellant did not challenge during CIRP; accordingly the Plan's classification and treatment did not contravene Section 30(2) and warranted no interference - appeal dismissed; appellant remains free to pursue execution of an existing DRT decree against the corporate debtor. - NCLAT
Whether the appellant's claim qualified as a "financial debt" under Section 5(8) of the IBC and therefore should have been classified as a financial creditor: the tribunal held that the resolution professional's uploaded List of Creditors treated the appellant as an "other creditor," a classification the appellant did not challenge during CIRP; accordingly the Plan's classification and treatment did not contravene Section 30(2) and warranted no interference - appeal dismissed; appellant remains free to pursue execution of an existing DRT decree against the corporate debtor. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
