https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96048 Whether the appellant's claim qualified as a "financial debt" under Section 5(8) of the IBC and therefore should have been classified as a financial creditor: the tribunal held that the resolution professional's uploaded List of Creditors treated the appellant as an "other creditor," a classification the appellant did not challenge during CIRP; accordingly the Plan's classification and treatment did not contravene Section 30(2) and warranted no interference - appeal dismissed; appellant remains free to pursue execution of an existing DRT decree against the corporate debtor. - NCLAT en-us Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:31:43 +0530 Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:31:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96048 Whether the appellant's claim qualified as a "financial debt" under Section 5(8) of the IBC and therefore should have been classified as a financial creditor: the tribunal held that the resolution professional's uploaded List of Creditors treated the appellant as an "other creditor," a classification the appellant did not challenge during CIRP; accordingly the Plan's classification and treatment did not contravene Section 30(2) and warranted no interference - appeal dismissed; appellant remains free to pursue execution of an existing DRT decree against the corporate debtor. - NCLAT Highlights IBC Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:31:43 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96048