Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Whether the appellant's claim qualified as a "financial debt" under Section 5(8) of the IBC and therefore should have been classified as a financial creditor: the tribunal held that the resolution professional's uploaded List of Creditors treated the appellant as an "other creditor," a classification the appellant did not challenge during CIRP; accordingly the Plan's classification and treatment did not contravene Section 30(2) and warranted no interference - appeal dismissed; appellant remains free to pursue execution of an existing DRT decree against the corporate debtor. - NCLAT
Whether the appellant's claim qualified as a "financial debt" under Section 5(8) of the IBC and therefore should have been classified as a financial creditor: the tribunal held that the resolution professional's uploaded List of Creditors treated the appellant as an "other creditor," a classification the appellant did not challenge during CIRP; accordingly the Plan's classification and treatment did not contravene Section 30(2) and warranted no interference - appeal dismissed; appellant remains free to pursue execution of an existing DRT decree against the corporate debtor. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
