Limitation period commencement and procedural inquiry rules: identity-based limitation upheld; complaints by authorised public servants need not attra...
Pre-trial bail granted where custodial period, documentary prosecution, and magistrate-triable offence favor release subject to surety and no witness ...
Allowability of Salary Exemptions: Form 16 entries can substantiate HRA and other salary exemptions, and home loan interest is deductible for a self-o...
Petition held to raise a dominant issue of breach of principles of natural justice where attachment of the petitioner's bank occurred without affording adequate opportunity to reply; court adopted a justice-oriented approach, finding the petitioner's failure to respond attributable to bona fide reasons and unavoidable circumstances, and directed reconsideration from the stage of filing a reply to the show-cause notice. Consequence: adjudication order under Section 73(9) KGST Act, 2017 and subsequent order under Section 107(1) SGST/CGST Act are set aside and matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law. - HC
Petition held to raise a dominant issue of breach of principles of natural justice where attachment of the petitioner's bank occurred without affording adequate opportunity to reply; court adopted a justice-oriented approach, finding the petitioner's failure to respond attributable to bona fide reasons and unavoidable circumstances, and directed reconsideration from the stage of filing a reply to the show-cause notice. Consequence: adjudication order under Section 73(9) KGST Act, 2017 and subsequent order under Section 107(1) SGST/CGST Act are set aside and matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.