Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adjudication order passed under Section 73(9) and the appellate order under Section 107(1) should be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration because the assessee was not afforded adequate opportunity to reply to the show-cause notice.
Analysis: The Court examined the consequence of proceedings under Section 73 of the GST legislation where a show-cause notice was issued but the assessee did not submit a reply. The Court applied the principle of audi alteram partem and considered whether the absence of adequate notice or opportunity to file a response constituted sufficient cause to nullify prior adjudication and appellate decisions. Having regard to the asserted bona fide inability to reply and the requirement that adjudicatory authorities provide reasonable opportunity to be heard before confirming demands or initiating recovery measures, the Court treated the fairness of the procedure as determinative and whether remand for fresh consideration is the appropriate remedy to cure any breach of natural justice.
Conclusion: The adjudication order under Section 73(9) and the appellate order under Section 107(1) are set aside and the matter is remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration from the stage of permitting the assessee to submit its reply, in favour of the assessee.