Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Whether a victim has locus to appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C.: court, relying on Supreme Court precedent, holds that a victim has the statutory right to file an appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C.; consequence-leave petition is to be treated as an appeal under Section 372 and placed before the appropriate Court for adjudication on merits. Whether judicial interpretation is retrospective or prospective: court affirms that a judgment interpreting a statute declares the statute's meaning from inception (retrospective effect), while prospective overruling relates to enactments; consequence-the declared legal principle applies to all cases irrespective of pendency stage. - HC
Whether a victim has locus to appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C.: court, relying on Supreme Court precedent, holds that a victim has the statutory right to file an appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C.; consequence-leave petition is to be treated as an appeal under Section 372 and placed before the appropriate Court for adjudication on merits. Whether judicial interpretation is retrospective or prospective: court affirms that a judgment interpreting a statute declares the statute's meaning from inception (retrospective effect), while prospective overruling relates to enactments; consequence-the declared legal principle applies to all cases irrespective of pendency stage. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
