<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Victim&#039;s right to appeal u/s 372 CrPC affirmed; leave petitions treated as appeals, ruling given retrospective effect</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95999</link>
    <description>Whether a victim has locus to appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C.: court, relying on Supreme Court precedent, holds that a victim has the statutory right to file an appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C.; consequence-leave petition is to be treated as an appeal under Section 372 and placed before the appropriate Court for adjudication on merits. Whether judicial interpretation is retrospective or prospective: court affirms that a judgment interpreting a statute declares the statute&#039;s meaning from inception (retrospective effect), while prospective overruling relates to enactments; consequence-the declared legal principle applies to all cases irrespective of pendency stage. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:09:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:09:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Victim&#039;s right to appeal u/s 372 CrPC affirmed; leave petitions treated as appeals, ruling given retrospective effect</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95999</link>
      <description>Whether a victim has locus to appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C.: court, relying on Supreme Court precedent, holds that a victim has the statutory right to file an appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C.; consequence-leave petition is to be treated as an appeal under Section 372 and placed before the appropriate Court for adjudication on merits. Whether judicial interpretation is retrospective or prospective: court affirms that a judgment interpreting a statute declares the statute&#039;s meaning from inception (retrospective effect), while prospective overruling relates to enactments; consequence-the declared legal principle applies to all cases irrespective of pendency stage. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:09:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>