Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Whether a victim has locus to appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C.: court, relying on Supreme Court precedent, holds that a victim has the statutory right to file an appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C.; consequence-leave petition is to be treated as an appeal under Section 372 and placed before the appropriate Court for adjudication on merits. Whether judicial interpretation is retrospective or prospective: court affirms that a judgment interpreting a statute declares the statute's meaning from inception (retrospective effect), while prospective overruling relates to enactments; consequence-the declared legal principle applies to all cases irrespective of pendency stage. - HC
Whether a victim has locus to appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C.: court, relying on Supreme Court precedent, holds that a victim has the statutory right to file an appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C.; consequence-leave petition is to be treated as an appeal under Section 372 and placed before the appropriate Court for adjudication on merits. Whether judicial interpretation is retrospective or prospective: court affirms that a judgment interpreting a statute declares the statute's meaning from inception (retrospective effect), while prospective overruling relates to enactments; consequence-the declared legal principle applies to all cases irrespective of pendency stage. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
