Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
The principal issue was residential status under s.6(1) Explanation 1(b) for AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20. Applying the exclusion of day of arrival (per Manoj Kumar Reddy) the assessee's stays were under 182 days (180, 173, 175), so he did not meet the 182-day threshold; accordingly he is not a resident for those years - outcome: non-resident. Separately, under Explanation (e) to s.115C the assessee was outside India for employment, reinforcing non-resident status. The tribunal allowed the taxpayer's grounds and held him non-resident for the three assessment years. - ITAT
The principal issue was residential status under s.6(1) Explanation 1(b) for AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20. Applying the exclusion of day of arrival (per Manoj Kumar Reddy) the assessee's stays were under 182 days (180, 173, 175), so he did not meet the 182-day threshold; accordingly he is not a resident for those years - outcome: non-resident. Separately, under Explanation (e) to s.115C the assessee was outside India for employment, reinforcing non-resident status. The tribunal allowed the taxpayer's grounds and held him non-resident for the three assessment years. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
