https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95992 The principal issue was residential status under s.6(1) Explanation 1(b) for AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20. Applying the exclusion of day of arrival (per Manoj Kumar Reddy) the assessee's stays were under 182 days (180, 173, 175), so he did not meet the 182-day threshold; accordingly he is not a resident for those years - outcome: non-resident. Separately, under Explanation (e) to s.115C the assessee was outside India for employment, reinforcing non-resident status. The tribunal allowed the taxpayer's grounds and held him non-resident for the three assessment years. - ITAT en-us Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:50:43 +0530 Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:50:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95992 The principal issue was residential status under s.6(1) Explanation 1(b) for AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20. Applying the exclusion of day of arrival (per Manoj Kumar Reddy) the assessee's stays were under 182 days (180, 173, 175), so he did not meet the 182-day threshold; accordingly he is not a resident for those years - outcome: non-resident. Separately, under Explanation (e) to s.115C the assessee was outside India for employment, reinforcing non-resident status. The tribunal allowed the taxpayer's grounds and held him non-resident for the three assessment years. - ITAT Highlights Income Tax Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:50:43 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95992