Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Prosecution for failure to remit tax deducted at source within the prescribed time under ss. 276B read with 278AA of the Income-tax Act was sought to be quashed on the ground of "reasonable cause." The court below accepted that the delay was not wilful, was attributable to staff unavailability due to maternity leave, and was fully cured by subsequent payment and continued timely compliance thereafter; on this conduct, continuation of criminal proceedings was held unwarranted and the complaint was quashed. The challenge to that quashing order was rejected as no ground for interference under Art. 136 was made out, and the petition was dismissed - SC
Prosecution for failure to remit tax deducted at source within the prescribed time under ss. 276B read with 278AA of the Income-tax Act was sought to be quashed on the ground of "reasonable cause." The court below accepted that the delay was not wilful, was attributable to staff unavailability due to maternity leave, and was fully cured by subsequent payment and continued timely compliance thereafter; on this conduct, continuation of criminal proceedings was held unwarranted and the complaint was quashed. The challenge to that quashing order was rejected as no ground for interference under Art. 136 was made out, and the petition was dismissed - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.