Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Delay in remitting TDS under s. 276B-maternity leave staff shortage cited as reasonable cause; prosecution quashed, challenge dismissed.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Prosecution for failure to remit tax deducted at source within the prescribed time under ss. 276B read with 278AA of the Income-tax Act was sought to be quashed on the ground of "reasonable cause." The court below accepted that the delay was not wilful, was attributable to staff unavailability due to maternity leave, and was fully cured by subsequent payment and continued timely compliance thereafter; on this conduct, continuation of criminal proceedings was held unwarranted and the complaint was quashed. The challenge to that quashing order was rejected as no ground for interference under Art. 136 was made out, and the petition was dismissed - SC....