Jurisdictional validity: notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer invalidates reassessment where no formal transfer or independent verification o...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5861 to 5880 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition under ss. 69 and 69C for alleged unexplained investment and expenditure in purchase of immovable property held jointly with the assessee's parent was unsustainable because the assessee established the source of funds as amounts received from the other parent's accumulated salary and pension savings, and the revenue failed to rebut this explanation. The absence of old retirement documents was not treated as fatal given the long lapse of time since retirement and the availability of fund-utilization details for the purchase consideration and incidental expenses. The additions were directed to be deleted and the appeal was allowed - ITAT
Addition under ss. 69 and 69C for alleged unexplained investment and expenditure in purchase of immovable property held jointly with the assessee's parent was unsustainable because the assessee established the source of funds as amounts received from the other parent's accumulated salary and pension savings, and the revenue failed to rebut this explanation. The absence of old retirement documents was not treated as fatal given the long lapse of time since retirement and the availability of fund-utilization details for the purchase consideration and incidental expenses. The additions were directed to be deleted and the appeal was allowed - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
