<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Joint purchase of immovable property with parent: alleged unexplained investment and expenses u/ss69/69C deleted after sources proved.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95959</link>
    <description>Addition under ss. 69 and 69C for alleged unexplained investment and expenditure in purchase of immovable property held jointly with the assessee&#039;s parent was unsustainable because the assessee established the source of funds as amounts received from the other parent&#039;s accumulated salary and pension savings, and the revenue failed to rebut this explanation. The absence of old retirement documents was not treated as fatal given the long lapse of time since retirement and the availability of fund-utilization details for the purchase consideration and incidental expenses. The additions were directed to be deleted and the appeal was allowed - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 16:56:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 16:56:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Joint purchase of immovable property with parent: alleged unexplained investment and expenses u/ss69/69C deleted after sources proved.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95959</link>
      <description>Addition under ss. 69 and 69C for alleged unexplained investment and expenditure in purchase of immovable property held jointly with the assessee&#039;s parent was unsustainable because the assessee established the source of funds as amounts received from the other parent&#039;s accumulated salary and pension savings, and the revenue failed to rebut this explanation. The absence of old retirement documents was not treated as fatal given the long lapse of time since retirement and the availability of fund-utilization details for the purchase consideration and incidental expenses. The additions were directed to be deleted and the appeal was allowed - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 16:56:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>