Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Effective service requirement: officers must explore alternative service modes beyond the GST portal and afford personal hearing; non-compliance voids...
Proceedings initiated by issuance of notice under s.153C were held not maintainable because the assessee's own premises had been searched, making him a "searched person" and not an "other person" within the scope of s.153C; consequently, the notice and consequential proceedings were quashed. Independently, the assessment order was held time-barred since, despite bearing the last permissible date and reflecting DIN generation on that date, the order did not leave the department's control and was actually booked/dispatched after the limitation date, so it could not be treated as passed within time; accordingly, the assessment order was set aside and the writ was allowed. - HC
Proceedings initiated by issuance of notice under s.153C were held not maintainable because the assessee's own premises had been searched, making him a "searched person" and not an "other person" within the scope of s.153C; consequently, the notice and consequential proceedings were quashed. Independently, the assessment order was held time-barred since, despite bearing the last permissible date and reflecting DIN generation on that date, the order did not leave the department's control and was actually booked/dispatched after the limitation date, so it could not be treated as passed within time; accordingly, the assessment order was set aside and the writ was allowed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
