<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax search assessment of searched person wrongly issued s.153C notice; delayed dispatch made order time-barred, proceedings quashed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95912</link>
    <description>Proceedings initiated by issuance of notice under s.153C were held not maintainable because the assessee&#039;s own premises had been searched, making him a &quot;searched person&quot; and not an &quot;other person&quot; within the scope of s.153C; consequently, the notice and consequential proceedings were quashed. Independently, the assessment order was held time-barred since, despite bearing the last permissible date and reflecting DIN generation on that date, the order did not leave the department&#039;s control and was actually booked/dispatched after the limitation date, so it could not be treated as passed within time; accordingly, the assessment order was set aside and the writ was allowed. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:25:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:25:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax search assessment of searched person wrongly issued s.153C notice; delayed dispatch made order time-barred, proceedings quashed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95912</link>
      <description>Proceedings initiated by issuance of notice under s.153C were held not maintainable because the assessee&#039;s own premises had been searched, making him a &quot;searched person&quot; and not an &quot;other person&quot; within the scope of s.153C; consequently, the notice and consequential proceedings were quashed. Independently, the assessment order was held time-barred since, despite bearing the last permissible date and reflecting DIN generation on that date, the order did not leave the department&#039;s control and was actually booked/dispatched after the limitation date, so it could not be treated as passed within time; accordingly, the assessment order was set aside and the writ was allowed. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:25:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>