Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
The dominant issue was whether the circuit bench had territorial jurisdiction to entertain an appeal and cross-objection arising from an assessment order passed by an assessing officer at another station. On a reference due to a difference of opinion between members, the third member held that the circuit bench lacked jurisdiction over the appeal; consequently, the appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed. Parties were left at liberty to pursue appropriate remedies before the competent forum, and the revenue was similarly permitted to approach the appropriate forum if so advised. - ITAT
The dominant issue was whether the circuit bench had territorial jurisdiction to entertain an appeal and cross-objection arising from an assessment order passed by an assessing officer at another station. On a reference due to a difference of opinion between members, the third member held that the circuit bench lacked jurisdiction over the appeal; consequently, the appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed. Parties were left at liberty to pursue appropriate remedies before the competent forum, and the revenue was similarly permitted to approach the appropriate forum if so advised. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.