Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2026 (1) TMI 466 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Income tax appeal over Kolkata ITO assessment filed at wrong ITAT bench; Varanasi bench held no territorial jurisdiction, dismissed. The dominant issue was whether the ITAT Varanasi Circuit Bench had territorial jurisdiction to adjudicate an appeal and cross-objection arising from an ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Income tax appeal over Kolkata ITO assessment filed at wrong ITAT bench; Varanasi bench held no territorial jurisdiction, dismissed.

                            The dominant issue was whether the ITAT Varanasi Circuit Bench had territorial jurisdiction to adjudicate an appeal and cross-objection arising from an assessment order passed by an ITO at Kolkata. On a reference due to a difference of opinion between the JM and AM, the Third Member held, on a conjoint reading of the relevant orders and the questions referred, that the Varanasi Bench lacked jurisdiction over the matter; consequently, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable. The parties were left at liberty to pursue appropriate remedies in accordance with law, and the Revenue was likewise permitted to approach the competent forum at the appropriate place.




                            1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

                            (i) Whether the Varanasi Circuit Bench of the Tribunal had territorial jurisdiction to hear and determine an appeal and cross-objection arising from an assessment order passed by an Assessing Officer located in Kolkata.

                            (ii) Whether, upon holding that it lacked territorial jurisdiction, the Varanasi Circuit Bench could nonetheless adjudicate the validity of the first appellate order or the merits of additions deleted therein.

                            2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                            Issue (i): Territorial jurisdiction of the Tribunal to entertain the appeal and cross-objection

                            Legal framework (as discussed by the Court): The Court applied the principle that appellate territorial jurisdiction is determined with reference to the location/situs of the Assessing Officer who passed the impugned assessment order. The Court also considered Rule 4(1) of the Tribunal's Rules and the standing orders allocating territorial jurisdiction among Benches.

                            Interpretation and reasoning: Since the impugned assessment order was passed by an Assessing Officer stationed in Kolkata, the Bench having territorial jurisdiction over that Assessing Officer was the appropriate Tribunal Bench. The standing arrangement for allocation of Tribunal work placed matters arising from the relevant territory with the Kolkata Benches. The Court held that, in the absence of any special order conferring jurisdiction on the Varanasi Circuit Bench, the appeal filed at Varanasi was not competent. The Court further accepted that subsequent events (including any later administrative changes or alleged transfer-related considerations) did not confer territorial jurisdiction on a Bench that otherwise lacked it for an appeal arising from the assessment order passed at Kolkata.

                            Conclusion: The Varanasi Circuit Bench lacked territorial jurisdiction; consequently, both the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objection were held to be not maintainable before that Bench and were dismissed on that ground.

                            Issue (ii): Power of a Bench lacking jurisdiction to decide validity/merits of the impugned orders

                            Legal framework (as discussed by the Court): The Court proceeded on the premise that a forum which lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain an appeal cannot go beyond the jurisdictional bar to render findings on other issues, including merits, as those issues are to be examined only by the competent forum.

                            Interpretation and reasoning: Having held that the Varanasi Circuit Bench had no jurisdiction to hear and determine the appeal arising from the assessment order, the Court reasoned that it could not adjudicate the validity of the first appellate order or the merits of the additions that had been deleted. Any such findings would have to be left to the appropriate Tribunal Bench having territorial jurisdiction. The Court therefore treated the remaining controversies (including questions relating to jurisdictional objections under the Income-tax Act, and merits of the additions) as redundant/academic in the present proceedings.

                            Conclusion: The Court declined to decide the merits or other ancillary questions once lack of territorial jurisdiction was found, and limited the disposal to dismissal for non-maintainability, with liberty to the parties to pursue remedies before the appropriate forum.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found