Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
The dominant issue was whether the circuit bench had territorial jurisdiction to entertain an appeal and cross-objection arising from an assessment order passed by an assessing officer at another station. On a reference due to a difference of opinion between members, the third member held that the circuit bench lacked jurisdiction over the appeal; consequently, the appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed. Parties were left at liberty to pursue appropriate remedies before the competent forum, and the revenue was similarly permitted to approach the appropriate forum if so advised. - ITAT
The dominant issue was whether the circuit bench had territorial jurisdiction to entertain an appeal and cross-objection arising from an assessment order passed by an assessing officer at another station. On a reference due to a difference of opinion between members, the third member held that the circuit bench lacked jurisdiction over the appeal; consequently, the appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed. Parties were left at liberty to pursue appropriate remedies before the competent forum, and the revenue was similarly permitted to approach the appropriate forum if so advised. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.