Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
The dominant issue was whether the circuit bench had territorial jurisdiction to entertain an appeal and cross-objection arising from an assessment order passed by an assessing officer at another station. On a reference due to a difference of opinion between members, the third member held that the circuit bench lacked jurisdiction over the appeal; consequently, the appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed. Parties were left at liberty to pursue appropriate remedies before the competent forum, and the revenue was similarly permitted to approach the appropriate forum if so advised. - ITAT
The dominant issue was whether the circuit bench had territorial jurisdiction to entertain an appeal and cross-objection arising from an assessment order passed by an assessing officer at another station. On a reference due to a difference of opinion between members, the third member held that the circuit bench lacked jurisdiction over the appeal; consequently, the appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed. Parties were left at liberty to pursue appropriate remedies before the competent forum, and the revenue was similarly permitted to approach the appropriate forum if so advised. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
