Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where TDS was deducted from the taxpayer's salary as evidenced by the TDS certificate but did not reflect in Form 26AS due to the employer's non-deposit, the taxpayer could not be treated as in default or made to bear the tax demand. Once salary is paid after deduction, the statutory obligation to deposit the deducted TDS lies solely on the employer as the tax-collecting agent under Chapter XVII, and the taxpayer has no control over subsequent remittance. Accordingly, the assessing officer was directed not to recover the demand from the taxpayer and to pursue recovery or other remedial action against the employer; the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Where TDS was deducted from the taxpayer's salary as evidenced by the TDS certificate but did not reflect in Form 26AS due to the employer's non-deposit, the taxpayer could not be treated as in default or made to bear the tax demand. Once salary is paid after deduction, the statutory obligation to deposit the deducted TDS lies solely on the employer as the tax-collecting agent under Chapter XVII, and the taxpayer has no control over subsequent remittance. Accordingly, the assessing officer was directed not to recover the demand from the taxpayer and to pursue recovery or other remedial action against the employer; the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.