Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
Where additional income declared during search was credited as loans, it was held that, since the taxpayer's only activity was land trading and the amount was already offered and accepted as business income, it could not be taxed as unexplained cash credit under s.68 read with s.115BBE; the addition was deleted. On alleged on-money enhancing capital gains, unsigned and undated seized notings and lack of corroboration, coupled with some plots not being sold as alleged, were held insufficient; the addition was deleted. Direction to verify telescoping/set-off of disclosed income against other additions was sustained. Deletion of s.69C addition was upheld for want of error in appreciation of explained expenditure. Addition under s.69 read with s.115BBE based on cancelled loose-paper notings, without corroboration, was set aside. - ITAT
Where additional income declared during search was credited as loans, it was held that, since the taxpayer's only activity was land trading and the amount was already offered and accepted as business income, it could not be taxed as unexplained cash credit under s.68 read with s.115BBE; the addition was deleted. On alleged on-money enhancing capital gains, unsigned and undated seized notings and lack of corroboration, coupled with some plots not being sold as alleged, were held insufficient; the addition was deleted. Direction to verify telescoping/set-off of disclosed income against other additions was sustained. Deletion of s.69C addition was upheld for want of error in appreciation of explained expenditure. Addition under s.69 read with s.115BBE based on cancelled loose-paper notings, without corroboration, was set aside. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
