Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Where additional income declared during search was credited as loans, it was held that, since the taxpayer's only activity was land trading and the amount was already offered and accepted as business income, it could not be taxed as unexplained cash credit under s.68 read with s.115BBE; the addition was deleted. On alleged on-money enhancing capital gains, unsigned and undated seized notings and lack of corroboration, coupled with some plots not being sold as alleged, were held insufficient; the addition was deleted. Direction to verify telescoping/set-off of disclosed income against other additions was sustained. Deletion of s.69C addition was upheld for want of error in appreciation of explained expenditure. Addition under s.69 read with s.115BBE based on cancelled loose-paper notings, without corroboration, was set aside. - ITAT
Where additional income declared during search was credited as loans, it was held that, since the taxpayer's only activity was land trading and the amount was already offered and accepted as business income, it could not be taxed as unexplained cash credit under s.68 read with s.115BBE; the addition was deleted. On alleged on-money enhancing capital gains, unsigned and undated seized notings and lack of corroboration, coupled with some plots not being sold as alleged, were held insufficient; the addition was deleted. Direction to verify telescoping/set-off of disclosed income against other additions was sustained. Deletion of s.69C addition was upheld for want of error in appreciation of explained expenditure. Addition under s.69 read with s.115BBE based on cancelled loose-paper notings, without corroboration, was set aside. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
