NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Where additional income declared during search was credited as loans, it was held that, since the taxpayer's only activity was land trading and the amount was already offered and accepted as business income, it could not be taxed as unexplained cash credit under s.68 read with s.115BBE; the addition was deleted. On alleged on-money enhancing capital gains, unsigned and undated seized notings and lack of corroboration, coupled with some plots not being sold as alleged, were held insufficient; the addition was deleted. Direction to verify telescoping/set-off of disclosed income against other additions was sustained. Deletion of s.69C addition was upheld for want of error in appreciation of explained expenditure. Addition under s.69 read with s.115BBE based on cancelled loose-paper notings, without corroboration, was set aside. - ITAT
Where additional income declared during search was credited as loans, it was held that, since the taxpayer's only activity was land trading and the amount was already offered and accepted as business income, it could not be taxed as unexplained cash credit under s.68 read with s.115BBE; the addition was deleted. On alleged on-money enhancing capital gains, unsigned and undated seized notings and lack of corroboration, coupled with some plots not being sold as alleged, were held insufficient; the addition was deleted. Direction to verify telescoping/set-off of disclosed income against other additions was sustained. Deletion of s.69C addition was upheld for want of error in appreciation of explained expenditure. Addition under s.69 read with s.115BBE based on cancelled loose-paper notings, without corroboration, was set aside. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
