Expenses for overseas film shooting treated as services availed outside India, so no reverse charge service tax liability; cenvat reversals and penalt...
Electricity consumptionbased clandestine production estimates under the repealed Central Excise Act found insufficient; demand quashed and appeals all...
Interest paid on a housing loan used to acquire immovable property was held to be a financial liability and not part of the "cost of acquisition" for capital gains purposes; it is deductible, if otherwise permissible, under the head "income from house property" as revenue expenditure, and cannot be capitalised into acquisition cost, resulting in rejection of the related grounds. On an amount paid for delayed possession sought to be treated as part of acquisition cost, the matter was correctly remitted for verification whether it was actually claimed in computation; if not claimed, no disallowance/addition could be made, and the appeal against remand was rejected. - ITAT
Interest paid on a housing loan used to acquire immovable property was held to be a financial liability and not part of the "cost of acquisition" for capital gains purposes; it is deductible, if otherwise permissible, under the head "income from house property" as revenue expenditure, and cannot be capitalised into acquisition cost, resulting in rejection of the related grounds. On an amount paid for delayed possession sought to be treated as part of acquisition cost, the matter was correctly remitted for verification whether it was actually claimed in computation; if not claimed, no disallowance/addition could be made, and the appeal against remand was rejected. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
