<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Housing loan interest and delayed possession payment in property purchase: not added to acquisition cost, remand upheld</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95730</link>
    <description>Interest paid on a housing loan used to acquire immovable property was held to be a financial liability and not part of the &quot;cost of acquisition&quot; for capital gains purposes; it is deductible, if otherwise permissible, under the head &quot;income from house property&quot; as revenue expenditure, and cannot be capitalised into acquisition cost, resulting in rejection of the related grounds. On an amount paid for delayed possession sought to be treated as part of acquisition cost, the matter was correctly remitted for verification whether it was actually claimed in computation; if not claimed, no disallowance/addition could be made, and the appeal against remand was rejected. - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 08:04:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 08:04:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Housing loan interest and delayed possession payment in property purchase: not added to acquisition cost, remand upheld</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95730</link>
      <description>Interest paid on a housing loan used to acquire immovable property was held to be a financial liability and not part of the &quot;cost of acquisition&quot; for capital gains purposes; it is deductible, if otherwise permissible, under the head &quot;income from house property&quot; as revenue expenditure, and cannot be capitalised into acquisition cost, resulting in rejection of the related grounds. On an amount paid for delayed possession sought to be treated as part of acquisition cost, the matter was correctly remitted for verification whether it was actually claimed in computation; if not claimed, no disallowance/addition could be made, and the appeal against remand was rejected. - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 08:04:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>