Marketing support and subcontracted client contracts: no agency permanent establishment under Article 5 DTAA; arm's-length pricing bars profit attribu...
A person who was earlier a successful resolution applicant and later defaulted in implementing the resolution plan has no enforceable right to be heard on an application for liquidation and appointment of a liquidator, as this determination concerns the creditor-adjudicating authority matrix regarding subsisting financial liability, plan implementation, and default warranting liquidation. Since liquidation and liquidator appointment confer no specific statutory role or legal right on such person, non-issuance of notice is not infirm, including in light of the adjudicating authority's powers under the IBC. The person may only intervene with a limited right of audience at the stage of final orders, and the appeal challenging non-joinder was dismissed - NCLAT
A person who was earlier a successful resolution applicant and later defaulted in implementing the resolution plan has no enforceable right to be heard on an application for liquidation and appointment of a liquidator, as this determination concerns the creditor-adjudicating authority matrix regarding subsisting financial liability, plan implementation, and default warranting liquidation. Since liquidation and liquidator appointment confer no specific statutory role or legal right on such person, non-issuance of notice is not infirm, including in light of the adjudicating authority's powers under the IBC. The person may only intervene with a limited right of audience at the stage of final orders, and the appeal challenging non-joinder was dismissed - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
