<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Defaulting resolution applicant&#039;s role in plan implementation dispute: no right to notice or be heard on liquidation request</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95715</link>
    <description>A person who was earlier a successful resolution applicant and later defaulted in implementing the resolution plan has no enforceable right to be heard on an application for liquidation and appointment of a liquidator, as this determination concerns the creditor-adjudicating authority matrix regarding subsisting financial liability, plan implementation, and default warranting liquidation. Since liquidation and liquidator appointment confer no specific statutory role or legal right on such person, non-issuance of notice is not infirm, including in light of the adjudicating authority&#039;s powers under the IBC. The person may only intervene with a limited right of audience at the stage of final orders, and the appeal challenging non-joinder was dismissed - NCLAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 08:04:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 08:04:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Defaulting resolution applicant&#039;s role in plan implementation dispute: no right to notice or be heard on liquidation request</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95715</link>
      <description>A person who was earlier a successful resolution applicant and later defaulted in implementing the resolution plan has no enforceable right to be heard on an application for liquidation and appointment of a liquidator, as this determination concerns the creditor-adjudicating authority matrix regarding subsisting financial liability, plan implementation, and default warranting liquidation. Since liquidation and liquidator appointment confer no specific statutory role or legal right on such person, non-issuance of notice is not infirm, including in light of the adjudicating authority&#039;s powers under the IBC. The person may only intervene with a limited right of audience at the stage of final orders, and the appeal challenging non-joinder was dismissed - NCLAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 08:04:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>