Proceeds of crime and money laundering: PMLA prosecution requires subsisting predicate offence; discharge of predicate accused precludes further prose...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6821 to 6840 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rule 4(3) of the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016 is amended to prescribe execution requirements for the indemnity bond in Form STK-3A for Government companies (other than those already covered), including their subsidiaries, where the bond pertains to one or more directors appointed or nominated by the Central Government or a State Government. The indemnity bond must be furnished on behalf of the company by an authorised representative of the relevant administrative Ministry/Department of the Government of India or the State Government, not below the rank of Under Secretary or equivalent, thereby shifting authorised signatory responsibility from such directors to an eligible government officer for strike-off filings.
Rule 4(3) of the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016 is amended to prescribe execution requirements for the indemnity bond in Form STK-3A for Government companies (other than those already covered), including their subsidiaries, where the bond pertains to one or more directors appointed or nominated by the Central Government or a State Government. The indemnity bond must be furnished on behalf of the company by an authorised representative of the relevant administrative Ministry/Department of the Government of India or the State Government, not below the rank of Under Secretary or equivalent, thereby shifting authorised signatory responsibility from such directors to an eligible government officer for strike-off filings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
