NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Classification turned on whether an imported embolization coil is an "artificial part of the body" under CTI 9021 39 00 or an "other appliance, implanted in the body, to compensate for a defect or disability" under CTI 9021 90 90. The authority held that the coil is implanted and therapeutically compensates for vascular defects by producing controlled occlusion, but it does not replace or anatomically substitute a defective body part, which is the primary criterion for coverage as an artificial body part under the preceding CTI 9021 10 to 39 entries. Foreign rulings were found non-persuasive given differences at the Indian eight-digit level and dissimilar device function. Accordingly, the product was classified under CTI 9021 90 90. - AAR
Classification turned on whether an imported embolization coil is an "artificial part of the body" under CTI 9021 39 00 or an "other appliance, implanted in the body, to compensate for a defect or disability" under CTI 9021 90 90. The authority held that the coil is implanted and therapeutically compensates for vascular defects by producing controlled occlusion, but it does not replace or anatomically substitute a defective body part, which is the primary criterion for coverage as an artificial body part under the preceding CTI 9021 10 to 39 entries. Foreign rulings were found non-persuasive given differences at the Indian eight-digit level and dissimilar device function. Accordingly, the product was classified under CTI 9021 90 90. - AAR
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.