Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Whether statutory authorities could undertake post-CIRP assessment and raise claims for interest and damages under Sections 7Q and 14B for a pre-CIRP period was determined by applying the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. Relying on binding precedent, it was held that once moratorium is in force, no assessment proceedings can be carried out and, consequently, no such claim can be raised even if the liability relates to a period prior to CIRP. On this legal basis, the rejection of the applicant's claim/application was upheld and the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Whether statutory authorities could undertake post-CIRP assessment and raise claims for interest and damages under Sections 7Q and 14B for a pre-CIRP period was determined by applying the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. Relying on binding precedent, it was held that once moratorium is in force, no assessment proceedings can be carried out and, consequently, no such claim can be raised even if the liability relates to a period prior to CIRP. On this legal basis, the rejection of the applicant's claim/application was upheld and the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
