Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Whether statutory authorities could undertake post-CIRP assessment and raise claims for interest and damages under Sections 7Q and 14B for a pre-CIRP period was determined by applying the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. Relying on binding precedent, it was held that once moratorium is in force, no assessment proceedings can be carried out and, consequently, no such claim can be raised even if the liability relates to a period prior to CIRP. On this legal basis, the rejection of the applicant's claim/application was upheld and the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Whether statutory authorities could undertake post-CIRP assessment and raise claims for interest and damages under Sections 7Q and 14B for a pre-CIRP period was determined by applying the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. Relying on binding precedent, it was held that once moratorium is in force, no assessment proceedings can be carried out and, consequently, no such claim can be raised even if the liability relates to a period prior to CIRP. On this legal basis, the rejection of the applicant's claim/application was upheld and the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
