Co-operative society's mandatory reserve and share capital fixed deposits with banks-interest treated as business income under 80P(2)(a)(iii) deductio...
Income tax reassessment reopening after four years on investigation tip, without s.147 proviso disclosure failure, struck down as borrowed satisfactio...
Challenge to adjudication denying zero-rated turnover for FY 2019-20 turned on whether the proceedings were time-barred in light of multiple GST notifications extending limitation, whose validity is pending before the apex court and could materially affect the assessment. To avoid conflicting decisions and multiplicity of litigation, the adjudication order was set aside and the matter remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration and a de novo order in accordance with law, after granting a further opportunity. Relief was made conditional on payment of costs to the legal services authority within six weeks. - HC
Challenge to adjudication denying zero-rated turnover for FY 2019-20 turned on whether the proceedings were time-barred in light of multiple GST notifications extending limitation, whose validity is pending before the apex court and could materially affect the assessment. To avoid conflicting decisions and multiplicity of litigation, the adjudication order was set aside and the matter remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration and a de novo order in accordance with law, after granting a further opportunity. Relief was made conditional on payment of costs to the legal services authority within six weeks. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
