Imported cement concessional duty exemption under Notification 4/2006 challenged over RSP misdeclaration; demand, interest and s.114A penalty set asid...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7301 to 7320 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Challenge to adjudication denying zero-rated turnover for FY 2019-20 turned on whether the proceedings were time-barred in light of multiple GST notifications extending limitation, whose validity is pending before the apex court and could materially affect the assessment. To avoid conflicting decisions and multiplicity of litigation, the adjudication order was set aside and the matter remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration and a de novo order in accordance with law, after granting a further opportunity. Relief was made conditional on payment of costs to the legal services authority within six weeks. - HC
Challenge to adjudication denying zero-rated turnover for FY 2019-20 turned on whether the proceedings were time-barred in light of multiple GST notifications extending limitation, whose validity is pending before the apex court and could materially affect the assessment. To avoid conflicting decisions and multiplicity of litigation, the adjudication order was set aside and the matter remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration and a de novo order in accordance with law, after granting a further opportunity. Relief was made conditional on payment of costs to the legal services authority within six weeks. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
