Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Challenge to adjudication denying zero-rated turnover for FY 2019-20 turned on whether the proceedings were time-barred in light of multiple GST notifications extending limitation, whose validity is pending before the apex court and could materially affect the assessment. To avoid conflicting decisions and multiplicity of litigation, the adjudication order was set aside and the matter remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration and a de novo order in accordance with law, after granting a further opportunity. Relief was made conditional on payment of costs to the legal services authority within six weeks. - HC
Challenge to adjudication denying zero-rated turnover for FY 2019-20 turned on whether the proceedings were time-barred in light of multiple GST notifications extending limitation, whose validity is pending before the apex court and could materially affect the assessment. To avoid conflicting decisions and multiplicity of litigation, the adjudication order was set aside and the matter remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration and a de novo order in accordance with law, after granting a further opportunity. Relief was made conditional on payment of costs to the legal services authority within six weeks. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
