Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Managerial remuneration disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) challenged over alleged tax-avoidance; appellate decision restored deletion of addition for dir...
In assessment u/s 153C, disallowance of depreciation on alleged bogus power-plant cost was deleted because the addition rested only on retracted oral statements, with no corroborative seized material linking alleged subcontractors to cash generation or showing incriminating material relatable to the relevant AY; proceedings could not be sustained on assumptions, so the revenue's grounds failed. Disallowance u/s 2(24)(x) r.w.s. 36(1)(va) for employees' PF contribution was directed to be deleted if bank balance existed and delay was solely due to technical glitches, subject to AO verification. Depreciation on new assets put to use in March was remanded to AO for fresh verification of purchase/use evidence. Reduction in insurance claim was sustained as duly supported. Depreciation on WDV of the power plant was allowed on consistency where no change in facts was shown. - ITAT
In assessment u/s 153C, disallowance of depreciation on alleged bogus power-plant cost was deleted because the addition rested only on retracted oral statements, with no corroborative seized material linking alleged subcontractors to cash generation or showing incriminating material relatable to the relevant AY; proceedings could not be sustained on assumptions, so the revenue's grounds failed. Disallowance u/s 2(24)(x) r.w.s. 36(1)(va) for employees' PF contribution was directed to be deleted if bank balance existed and delay was solely due to technical glitches, subject to AO verification. Depreciation on new assets put to use in March was remanded to AO for fresh verification of purchase/use evidence. Reduction in insurance claim was sustained as duly supported. Depreciation on WDV of the power plant was allowed on consistency where no change in facts was shown. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
