Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of In assessment u/s 153C, disallowance of depreciation on alleged bogus power-plant cost was deleted because the addition rested only on retracted oral statements, with no corroborative seized material linking alleged subcontractors to cash generation or showing incriminating material relatable to the relevant AY; proceedings could not be sustained on assumptions, so the revenue's grounds failed. Disallowance u/s 2(24)(x) r.w.s. 36(1)(va) for employees' PF contribution was directed to be deleted if bank balance existed and delay was solely due to technical glitches, subject to AO verification. Depreciation on new assets put to use in March was remanded to AO for fresh verification of purchase/use evidence. Reduction in insurance claim was sustained as duly supported. Depreciation on WDV of the power plant was allowed on consistency where no change in facts was shown. - ITAT
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
