Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Interest on customers' fixed deposits was held deductible because the taxpayer produced contemporaneous evidence of deposits and TDS, and mere absence of payee-side acknowledgement could not justify disallowance; deletion was sustained. Disallowance under s.14A r.w. Rule 8D was held inapplicable as the investments were maintained for SLR/CRR as stock-in-trade, following binding precedent; deletion was sustained. Depreciation on temporary wooden structures and software expenditure were treated as allowable (as per consistency with earlier years); disallowances were rejected. Inter-office adjustment provision was treated as an allowable anticipated liability supported by material, not a contingent/non-existent liability; disallowance was rejected. Deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) was directed to be allowed on total provision (rural and non-rural). Depreciation on G-Secs, HTM premium amortization loss, and provision for non-performing investments were allowed. - ITAT
Interest on customers' fixed deposits was held deductible because the taxpayer produced contemporaneous evidence of deposits and TDS, and mere absence of payee-side acknowledgement could not justify disallowance; deletion was sustained. Disallowance under s.14A r.w. Rule 8D was held inapplicable as the investments were maintained for SLR/CRR as stock-in-trade, following binding precedent; deletion was sustained. Depreciation on temporary wooden structures and software expenditure were treated as allowable (as per consistency with earlier years); disallowances were rejected. Inter-office adjustment provision was treated as an allowable anticipated liability supported by material, not a contingent/non-existent liability; disallowance was rejected. Deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) was directed to be allowed on total provision (rural and non-rural). Depreciation on G-Secs, HTM premium amortization loss, and provision for non-performing investments were allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
