<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bank&#039;s tax deductions on customer fixed-deposit interest and SLR investments, plus depreciation and provisions, upheld; disallowances deleted</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95601</link>
    <description>Interest on customers&#039; fixed deposits was held deductible because the taxpayer produced contemporaneous evidence of deposits and TDS, and mere absence of payee-side acknowledgement could not justify disallowance; deletion was sustained. Disallowance under s.14A r.w. Rule 8D was held inapplicable as the investments were maintained for SLR/CRR as stock-in-trade, following binding precedent; deletion was sustained. Depreciation on temporary wooden structures and software expenditure were treated as allowable (as per consistency with earlier years); disallowances were rejected. Inter-office adjustment provision was treated as an allowable anticipated liability supported by material, not a contingent/non-existent liability; disallowance was reje.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 08:17:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 08:17:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bank&#039;s tax deductions on customer fixed-deposit interest and SLR investments, plus depreciation and provisions, upheld; disallowances deleted</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95601</link>
      <description>Interest on customers&#039; fixed deposits was held deductible because the taxpayer produced contemporaneous evidence of deposits and TDS, and mere absence of payee-side acknowledgement could not justify disallowance; deletion was sustained. Disallowance under s.14A r.w. Rule 8D was held inapplicable as the investments were maintained for SLR/CRR as stock-in-trade, following binding precedent; deletion was sustained. Depreciation on temporary wooden structures and software expenditure were treated as allowable (as per consistency with earlier years); disallowances were rejected. Inter-office adjustment provision was treated as an allowable anticipated liability supported by material, not a contingent/non-existent liability; disallowance was reje.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 08:17:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>