Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Credits treated as unexplained cash credits under s.68 were examined to determine whether they were trade advances. Where advances were received from customers (mostly through banking channels) and subsequently adjusted against sales invoices within a reasonable time, the credits were held to be genuine trade advances and not "loan creditors"; hence no enquiry into customer creditworthiness was required and the additions were deleted. Refund of excess labour advance from a goldsmith, recorded against job-work bills and received in cash consistent with trade practice, was held explained and the s.68 addition was deleted. Cash receipts from credit sales were not taxable under s.68 merely for alleged non-collection of TCS since s.206C(1D) was inapplicable due to turnover below s.44AB threshold; addition deleted. Cash deposits during demonetisation were supported by book cash and sales bills; s.69A addition deleted; consequently s.115BBE issue became academic. - ITAT
Credits treated as unexplained cash credits under s.68 were examined to determine whether they were trade advances. Where advances were received from customers (mostly through banking channels) and subsequently adjusted against sales invoices within a reasonable time, the credits were held to be genuine trade advances and not "loan creditors"; hence no enquiry into customer creditworthiness was required and the additions were deleted. Refund of excess labour advance from a goldsmith, recorded against job-work bills and received in cash consistent with trade practice, was held explained and the s.68 addition was deleted. Cash receipts from credit sales were not taxable under s.68 merely for alleged non-collection of TCS since s.206C(1D) was inapplicable due to turnover below s.44AB threshold; addition deleted. Cash deposits during demonetisation were supported by book cash and sales bills; s.69A addition deleted; consequently s.115BBE issue became academic. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
