PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Credits treated as unexplained cash credits under s.68 were examined to determine whether they were trade advances. Where advances were received from customers (mostly through banking channels) and subsequently adjusted against sales invoices within a reasonable time, the credits were held to be genuine trade advances and not "loan creditors"; hence no enquiry into customer creditworthiness was required and the additions were deleted. Refund of excess labour advance from a goldsmith, recorded against job-work bills and received in cash consistent with trade practice, was held explained and the s.68 addition was deleted. Cash receipts from credit sales were not taxable under s.68 merely for alleged non-collection of TCS since s.206C(1D) was inapplicable due to turnover below s.44AB threshold; addition deleted. Cash deposits during demonetisation were supported by book cash and sales bills; s.69A addition deleted; consequently s.115BBE issue became academic. - ITAT
Credits treated as unexplained cash credits under s.68 were examined to determine whether they were trade advances. Where advances were received from customers (mostly through banking channels) and subsequently adjusted against sales invoices within a reasonable time, the credits were held to be genuine trade advances and not "loan creditors"; hence no enquiry into customer creditworthiness was required and the additions were deleted. Refund of excess labour advance from a goldsmith, recorded against job-work bills and received in cash consistent with trade practice, was held explained and the s.68 addition was deleted. Cash receipts from credit sales were not taxable under s.68 merely for alleged non-collection of TCS since s.206C(1D) was inapplicable due to turnover below s.44AB threshold; addition deleted. Cash deposits during demonetisation were supported by book cash and sales bills; s.69A addition deleted; consequently s.115BBE issue became academic. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
