Imported cement concessional duty exemption under Notification 4/2006 challenged over RSP misdeclaration; demand, interest and s.114A penalty set asid...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7301 to 7320 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denial of SEIS benefits for FY 2016-17 on the ground that foreign exchange was realized in FY 2017-18 was held unsustainable because the prescribed form expressly permits claiming SEIS for foreign exchange earned in a financial year against services exported in the preceding year, and the relevant criterion is earning/realization of foreign exchange, not the year of export; the rejection order and consequential communication were set aside. Denial of SEIS benefits for components such as travel/transport, inspection, R&D, software, and re-invoicing was also held erroneous since these were integral to the exported engineering services and, once foreign exchange was earned for them, they were eligible; the matter was disposed with directions allowing the claim. - HC
Denial of SEIS benefits for FY 2016-17 on the ground that foreign exchange was realized in FY 2017-18 was held unsustainable because the prescribed form expressly permits claiming SEIS for foreign exchange earned in a financial year against services exported in the preceding year, and the relevant criterion is earning/realization of foreign exchange, not the year of export; the rejection order and consequential communication were set aside. Denial of SEIS benefits for components such as travel/transport, inspection, R&D, software, and re-invoicing was also held erroneous since these were integral to the exported engineering services and, once foreign exchange was earned for them, they were eligible; the matter was disposed with directions allowing the claim. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
