<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SEIS claims for exported engineering services and related costs despite next-year foreign exchange realization; denial orders set aside.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95553</link>
    <description>Denial of SEIS benefits for FY 2016-17 on the ground that foreign exchange was realized in FY 2017-18 was held unsustainable because the prescribed form expressly permits claiming SEIS for foreign exchange earned in a financial year against services exported in the preceding year, and the relevant criterion is earning/realization of foreign exchange, not the year of export; the rejection order and consequential communication were set aside. Denial of SEIS benefits for components such as travel/transport, inspection, R&amp;D, software, and re-invoicing was also held erroneous since these were integral to the exported engineering services and, once foreign exchange was earned for them, they were eligible; the matter was disposed with directions allowing the claim. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:43:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:43:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SEIS claims for exported engineering services and related costs despite next-year foreign exchange realization; denial orders set aside.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95553</link>
      <description>Denial of SEIS benefits for FY 2016-17 on the ground that foreign exchange was realized in FY 2017-18 was held unsustainable because the prescribed form expressly permits claiming SEIS for foreign exchange earned in a financial year against services exported in the preceding year, and the relevant criterion is earning/realization of foreign exchange, not the year of export; the rejection order and consequential communication were set aside. Denial of SEIS benefits for components such as travel/transport, inspection, R&amp;D, software, and re-invoicing was also held erroneous since these were integral to the exported engineering services and, once foreign exchange was earned for them, they were eligible; the matter was disposed with directions allowing the claim. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:43:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>