Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing adjustment based on selection of comparables was challenged on the ground that the excluded companies should have been retained. The court upheld exclusion because the fact-finding authority had concluded that the proposed comparables failed the functional similarity test, being engaged in activities other than the tested export service activity, and also failed the 75% export turnover filter since their export income was materially below the threshold while the tested party's revenue was entirely export-derived. As these determinations were pure findings of fact accepted by the appellate tribunal, no substantial question of law arose, and the appeal was dismissed. - HC
Transfer pricing adjustment based on selection of comparables was challenged on the ground that the excluded companies should have been retained. The court upheld exclusion because the fact-finding authority had concluded that the proposed comparables failed the functional similarity test, being engaged in activities other than the tested export service activity, and also failed the 75% export turnover filter since their export income was materially below the threshold while the tested party's revenue was entirely export-derived. As these determinations were pure findings of fact accepted by the appellate tribunal, no substantial question of law arose, and the appeal was dismissed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.