<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer pricing dispute over comparable companies for export services; exclusion upheld for functional mismatch and failing 75% export filter.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95549</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustment based on selection of comparables was challenged on the ground that the excluded companies should have been retained. The court upheld exclusion because the fact-finding authority had concluded that the proposed comparables failed the functional similarity test, being engaged in activities other than the tested export service activity, and also failed the 75% export turnover filter since their export income was materially below the threshold while the tested party&#039;s revenue was entirely export-derived. As these determinations were pure findings of fact accepted by the appellate tribunal, no substantial question of law arose, and the appeal was dismissed. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:23:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:23:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer pricing dispute over comparable companies for export services; exclusion upheld for functional mismatch and failing 75% export filter.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95549</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustment based on selection of comparables was challenged on the ground that the excluded companies should have been retained. The court upheld exclusion because the fact-finding authority had concluded that the proposed comparables failed the functional similarity test, being engaged in activities other than the tested export service activity, and also failed the 75% export turnover filter since their export income was materially below the threshold while the tested party&#039;s revenue was entirely export-derived. As these determinations were pure findings of fact accepted by the appellate tribunal, no substantial question of law arose, and the appeal was dismissed. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:23:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>