Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Penalty under s.271D for alleged contravention of s.269SS was examined on whether the assessee had "reasonable cause" under s.273B for receiving sale consideration in cash. The assessee received cash advance and balance consideration pursuant to a sale agreement executed before the amendment to s.269SS effective 01.06.2015, completed the registered conveyance in the presence of witnesses, and disclosed the full consideration with due taxes paid. Since the cash receipts were in terms of a pre-amendment contractual arrangement, the statutory "reasonable cause" protection applied, rendering the penalty unsustainable; the penalty was deleted and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Penalty under s.271D for alleged contravention of s.269SS was examined on whether the assessee had "reasonable cause" under s.273B for receiving sale consideration in cash. The assessee received cash advance and balance consideration pursuant to a sale agreement executed before the amendment to s.269SS effective 01.06.2015, completed the registered conveyance in the presence of witnesses, and disclosed the full consideration with due taxes paid. Since the cash receipts were in terms of a pre-amendment contractual arrangement, the statutory "reasonable cause" protection applied, rendering the penalty unsustainable; the penalty was deleted and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
