TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Cash sale consideration for immovable property under pre-01.06.2015 sale agreement held 'reasonable cause'; s.271D penalty deleted.</h1> The dominant issue was whether penalty under s.271D for contravention of s.269SS was sustainable, or whether 'reasonable cause' under s.273B was ... Penalty u/s 271D - assessee has violated provisions of Section 269SS - reasonable cause for the assessee to accept the cash consideration for sale of property or not? - HELD THAT:- In the present case, there is no dispute with regard to the fact that, the assessee had entered into an agreement for sale of property on 15.05.2015 and also received a sum of Rs. 15,00,000/- advance in cash and finally executed the sale deed in favour of the purchaser on 11.04.2016 and received the balance consideration of Rs. 15,78,000/- in cash in the presence of witnesses at the time of registration of the property before the Sub-Registrar. Assessee has also declared the sale consideration and paid the relevant taxes in the return of income filed for the relevant assessment year. Since the assessee has received the consideration in cash as per the contractual agreement entered into with the purchaser, and the said agreement was executed prior to the amendment to Section 269SS of the Act with effect from 01.06.2015, in our considered view, there exists a reasonable cause for the assessee for accepting the consideration in cash. Therefore, the case of the assessee falls under the provisions of Section 273B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, AO has erred in levying penalty u/s 271D of the Act for contravention of the provisions of Section 269SS of the Act. Appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. 1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED (i) Whether penalty under Section 271D was leviable for receipt of cash consideration of Rs. 15,78,000 towards transfer of immovable property, alleged as contravention of Section 269SS (as amended to include 'specified sum'), when the underlying agreement and initial cash advance were prior to 01.06.2015 and the assessee pleaded 'reasonable cause' under Section 273B. (ii) Whether the assessee's additional legal ground challenging the validity of the penalty order for want of satisfaction/valid initiation required adjudication, after the Tribunal granted relief on merits. 2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS Issue (i): Levy of penalty under Section 271D for cash receipt towards sale of immovable property; applicability of Section 273B 'reasonable cause' Legal framework (as discussed by the Tribunal): The Tribunal considered that Section 269SS (post amendment effective 01.06.2015) covers 'specified sum', described in the orders as any sum receivable, whether as advance or otherwise, in relation to transfer of immovable property, whether or not the transfer takes place; contravention attracts penalty under Section 271D. The Tribunal also examined Section 273B as providing relief from penalty where 'reasonable cause' exists for the failure. Interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal accepted as undisputed that cash of Rs. 15,78,000 was received at the time of registration of the sale deed, after an earlier cash advance of Rs. 15,00,000 received under an agreement dated 15.05.2015 (prior to 01.06.2015). The Tribunal emphasized the transactional context: the cash receipt at registration occurred pursuant to a pre-amendment contractual agreement, was received in the presence of witnesses before the registering authority, and the assessee disclosed the sale consideration and paid applicable taxes in the return. On these facts, the Tribunal declined to endorse the revenue authorities' approach of levying penalty solely on the basis that the later receipt occurred after 01.06.2015 and fell within 'specified sum'. The Tribunal treated the pre-amendment agreement and the contractual commitment to pay the balance at registration as establishing a bona fide explanation amounting to 'reasonable cause' for receipt of cash. Conclusions: The Tribunal held that the assessee's case fell within Section 273B and, therefore, penalty under Section 271D for the cash receipt of Rs. 15,78,000 was not sustainable. The penalty was deleted and relief was granted on merits. Issue (ii): Need to decide the additional legal ground challenging validity of penalty initiation/order (satisfaction requirement) Legal framework (as treated by the Tribunal): The Tribunal admitted the additional legal ground as a legal issue capable of being raised at the appellate stage, but evaluated whether it required determination after deciding the appeal on merits. Interpretation and reasoning: Although the parties argued the validity challenge extensively, the Tribunal found that once the penalty itself was deleted on merits, adjudication of the validity challenge would not affect the outcome. Conclusions: The Tribunal declined to decide the validity challenge on merits and dismissed the additional grounds as infructuous/academic in light of deletion of penalty.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
