NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Addition under s.69 for alleged unexplained fixed assets was rejected because the assessee had consistently disclosed the same asset value in successive balance sheets and earlier return filings, and the AO produced no material to show investment during the relevant year; the addition was deleted. Enhancement of closing capital and rejection of closing cash balance were held unjustified since the disclosed cash-in-hand was supported by the balance sheet and GST returns, and denial of capitalization flowed from the AO's incorrect reduction of cash; enhancement was allowed. Addition under s.69A was quashed as the assessment was framed without a mandatory show-cause notice, vitiating the order; the addition was deleted. Consequential penalties under s.272A(1)(d) were deleted. - ITAT
Addition under s.69 for alleged unexplained fixed assets was rejected because the assessee had consistently disclosed the same asset value in successive balance sheets and earlier return filings, and the AO produced no material to show investment during the relevant year; the addition was deleted. Enhancement of closing capital and rejection of closing cash balance were held unjustified since the disclosed cash-in-hand was supported by the balance sheet and GST returns, and denial of capitalization flowed from the AO's incorrect reduction of cash; enhancement was allowed. Addition under s.69A was quashed as the assessment was framed without a mandatory show-cause notice, vitiating the order; the addition was deleted. Consequential penalties under s.272A(1)(d) were deleted. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
