TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Addition under s.69 for alleged unexplained fixed assets was rejected because the assessee had consistently disclosed the same asset value in successive balance sheets and earlier return filings, and the AO produced no material to show investment during the relevant year; the addition was deleted. Enhancement of closing capital and rejection of closing cash balance were held unjustified since the disclosed cash-in-hand was supported by the balance sheet and GST returns, and denial of capitalization flowed from the AO's incorrect reduction of cash; enhancement was allowed. Addition under s.69A was quashed as the assessment was framed without a mandatory show-cause notice, vitiating the order; the addition was deleted. Consequential penalties under s.272A(1)(d) were deleted. - ITAT
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
