Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Marker testing and double haploid services were examined under Article 12(4) of the India-Netherlands DTAA to determine if receipts constituted royalty. Since the services did not merely generate reports but converted seeds into double haploid plants and supplied enhanced seeds for commercial exploitation, the process involved technology and scientific experience whose information was passed on to the Indian affiliate, satisfying the treaty's royalty definition; the challenge to royalty characterization was rejected. Separately, amounts recovered on a cost-to-cost basis for routine third-party IT support were treated as reimbursements, and no technical knowledge or process was "made available"; the receipts were held not taxable as FTS under section 9(1)(vii). - ITAT
Marker testing and double haploid services were examined under Article 12(4) of the India-Netherlands DTAA to determine if receipts constituted royalty. Since the services did not merely generate reports but converted seeds into double haploid plants and supplied enhanced seeds for commercial exploitation, the process involved technology and scientific experience whose information was passed on to the Indian affiliate, satisfying the treaty's royalty definition; the challenge to royalty characterization was rejected. Separately, amounts recovered on a cost-to-cost basis for routine third-party IT support were treated as reimbursements, and no technical knowledge or process was "made available"; the receipts were held not taxable as FTS under section 9(1)(vii). - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
